QUESTIONS TO ASK YOURSELF
Do you have answers?

If you would like to share your answers, contact us at jerry@jerrypippin.com.

1. What was in WTC Building 6 (US Customs House) that required that it be separately blown up, leaving a huge crater, prior to the collapse of  WTC Buildings 1 and 2 (the twin towers)?

2. Why were the tapes of firefighters in the twin towers reporting explosions prior to the collapse of the towers suppressed and not included as evidence in the 911 Commission Report? See the documentary 911 In Plane Site. The firefighters are interviewed.

3. Why were the seismological records of the impacts of the planes at the WTC and the subsequent collapse not publicized and not included in any analysis by the 911 Commission? Go here to see the evidence that points to a major demolition operation.

4. How did the owner of the WTC Building 7 manage to have the building pulled (a term meaning the application of a controlled demolition) when no one could have safely entered the burning building to do so, even if there were time to do so - which there was not. Set up for a demolition requires many days of preparation and work. In addition, why would he want this done. What of importance was in the building, which was relatively new? There were offices of the CIA, Secret Service, IRS, and SEC there, and the NYC Emergency Command Center was located there. In the documentary 911 In Plane Site, you will see the statement by the developer that he decided to have the building pulled. The website, www.WTC7.net, gives you the background, and asks many questions about how this building, which suffered limited fire damage form unknown sources, collapsed almost 8 hours after the Trade Center Towers collapsed. Other steel frame buildings adjacent to WTC 2, suffered severe damage and burned for almost 24 hours after the Towers collapsed, but they did not collapse.

5. Why would real estate magnet, Mr. Silverstein buy the WTC properties from the Port Authority of NY/NJ, only 2 months before 9/11, knowing that the original buildings were all in need of a major costly renovation to rid them of asbestos? Perhaps he knew that if the buildings were destroyed, he could collect the insurance, rebuild and still make a big profit? Did he know what was about to happen and know that it would be a very profitable investment?

6. Who made all the profits by selling out options, futures and equities on United Airlines, American Airlines and various companies with offices in the WTC, just days before 9/11? Officially, this would be classed as illegal insider trading. The sellers of the financial instruments were privy to knowledge that the WTC would be destroyed on 9/11 and that planes from two airline companies would be involved. There were records of the trades held by the brokers on both sides of the trades, but links back to the identities of the sellers were buried via a trail that resembled money laundering. The official records of the Depository Trust Company of the trades have now been "disappeared," as the SEC recently issued a report denying that any records exist to support the claims of the trades having occurred.

7. How could any passengers on the hi-jacked airplanes make any cell phone calls from the planes? This was technically not possible in 2001 and remains so today, although there is a pilot program being developed by American Airlines and Motorola to allow cell phone calls via special phones with chips that allow communication with satellites. Did the 9/11 plane passengers have preview models of these phones in there possession? Standard cell phones are inoperable once a plane's altitude exceeds 8000 feet and its speed exceeds 250 mph. Beyond those limits, signal acquisition and maintenance between call phones and ground cell towers is not possible. So when and under what conditions did those passengers make those cell phone calls to their friends and relatives that are documented in the 911 Commission Report? Check here and here for some answers and technologically accurate explanations.

8. How did the FBI, which claimed to have insufficient evidence of a 9/11 plot to have prevented it, come up with a definitive list of, description of whereabouts and activities of, and photographs of the 9/11 hijackers, within days of the attack? Also, how did several damaged passports get recorded from the various crash sites to substantiate the presence of these people on the plane, when not one body part or one piece of personal belongings, including: identification papers, such as a driver's license, jewelry, clothing and luggage, of any of the plane passengers were ever recovered? Look here for some, but not all, of the answers.

9. Why did the terrorist's names not appear on the flight manifests of the planes that were hijacked? These records were obtained from the airlines and published by the media.

10. Why are there only two surveillance camera records indicating that any of the terrorists were even in the airports from which they purportedly boarded the hijacked planes? One recording showing Atta passing through Boston Logan Airport, on September 10 on his way to another town to pick up a car and perhaps another fellow hijacker (no details known) was revealed on September 12 along with information on the rental car and its contents found at Logan. No other pictures from any of the other airports, which each have hundreds of surveillance cameras operating 24/7, ever surfaced until, so conveniently, a new tape appeared showing three of the hijackers passing through security checkpoints in Washington Dulles Airport, just prior to the release of the 9/11 Commission report. Apparently it was felt that more substantiation of the fact that hijackers were in those airports would be needed, but one case would be enough to convince the dump American public.

11. Is their any definitive photographic and eyewitness evidence that the planes that were involved in the hijackings really met their ends as stipulated by the media during and after the 9/11 events and in the 9/11 Commission reports? Were the planes that crashed into the WTC in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington commercial airliners, carrying crews, passengers and hijackers or something else entirely? Go here to get the video that asks and answers some, but not all, of these questions. You will see that of the four planes, only Flight 93 was likely the real plane, and it appears to have been shot down by a lone, white F-16 jet over Pennsylvania according to many eyewitnesses both in the air and on the ground. In addition, go here to hear new audio evidence that Flight 175 that hit WTC 2 fired a missile that resulted in multiple explosions as the plane entered the building.

12. Specifically, what happened to the plane that crashed into the Pentagon, AA Flight 77? No parts of the plane were ever recovered from the crash site. Go here for a quick photographic overview of the mysterious disappearing AA Flight 77, a Boeing 757, that crashed into the Pentagon. Commercial 757, missile, jet fighter or small business class jet? You decide. All of the evidence from video cameras along the flight path of Flight 77 was confiscated by government agents within minutes of the crash, never to be seen, except by a select few people.

13. Questions 11 and 12, lead to the question of what happened to all of the people on those four flights, if only one of the planes was an actual commercial airliner?  

14. Why did the FAA delay contacting NORAD once it was know by Air Traffic Controllers that the planes had been hijacked? And, once notified, why did NORAD not immediately launch appropriate intercept fighter jet flights and get authorization to shot down the planes from the President (as required by law)? See the documentary 911 In Plane Site and Go here for some proposed answers.

15. Was there a power down in the WTC 1 and 2 buildings over the weekend of September 8-9, 2001? If so, this would provide the opportunity for "wiring the buildings" for a massive demolition operation that would assure the destruction of the Towers since fire within the towers caused by plane crashes should not have caused the collapse of the buildings. No steel frame high rise has ever collapsed from fire damage. Here is a partial confirmation that the answer to the question is yes that was recently provided by a DP management employee of one of the companies with offices in WTC 2. Some other interesting information about events of the day and connections are also found in this report.

16. What caused the complete disintegration off the southern wing of WTC4, leaving only the north wing standing?

17. What caused fires in cars and trucks on the streets surrounding the Trade Center complex, blocks away from the site? The cars "hit" were in many cases melted, especially in the engine block areas.

18. Why were the tons of paper that fell out of the towers totally undamaged, not even singed and not burning even though right next to some of the burning vehicles on the streets.

19. Why was all (with only a few small exceptions - a piece of a metal file cabinet and a small piece of a telephone) the computer and office equipment in the building, including large metal fire safes that most companies had in their headquarters (even though they were no longer used because they became ovens for anything stored inside), seeming disintegrated? This has never been reported as a part of any fires, or bombings. Of course, it has never been reported in controlled demolitions, as all such equipment has been previously removed.

20. Is their any evidence that office and computer equipment was recovered from the WTC7 collapse debris pile? If so, what happened to it?

21. How does one explain the state of all the victims’ bodies, except those caught at the bottom of the buildings collapse or who jumped to their deaths? It appears that all other victims, who were in the towers when they collapsed, were shredded into very small pieces of flesh and bone, and there were far fewer pieces found, even including parts still being found on the site and on the tops of surrounding buildings, than could possibly account for the total body mass of the approximately 2, 500 people that were trapped inside the buildings when they fell. This seems to indicate even people, not just steel, aluminum, concrete, carpeting, tile, marble and office equipment were disintegrated into dust and very small pieces.

22. Relating to question 21, how could classic demolition using any kind of explosives, including thermite, cause the disintegration effects observed in WTC1 and 2?

23. With the unprecedented collapse of two 110 story buildings, why was their only a very small amount of collapse debris on the surface of the WTC1 and 2 building footprints, and why did the below ground shopping mall, PATH station, and subway stations and tunnels not completely collapse and be driven into a true thin pancake layer due to the weight of the collapsed buildings above them? Only areas where it seemed that some type of explosives may have gone off during the attack/collapse sequence seemed to show extreme damage underground. Does this again point to almost complete disintegration of the WTC1 and 2 structures? What kind of technology could possibly cause this kind of above ground destruction with attendant lack of destruction underground beneath the buildings in the sub-basements and underground mall? Were the Twin Towers almost weightless as they collapsed? Image the total weight of two 110 story steel frame towers with 110 floors of concrete flooring and 110 floors of office contents all collapsing onto the underground structures of the buildings.

24. What caused the fires in the Banker Trust Tower and the building at 90 West Street? Fire, although it occurred, did not gut Bankers Trust, but it was still declared unsalvageable, and insurance claims were satisfied. The Bankers Trust Building was a contemporary of the Trade Center complex, having been completed in the early 1970’s. It had the same asbestos problem as the Trade Center. Who is receiving the insurance money to disassemble the Bankers Trust Tower and replace it with a new WTC building? 

25. 90 West Street was surprisingly almost totally gutted by fire, but was not declared unsalvageable. It was totally renovated, as a historic landmark building. Note that it was a steel frame building. Why did it not collapse during the fire?

26. Who owned 90 West Street and Bankers Trust Tower properties before and after 9/11? What benefits were accrued from the demolition of one and the renovation of the other.  Could these two properties have suffered assisted, pre-planned disasters of their own? There were reports of “explosions and fires” in both buildings during the follow-up to the attack and collapse of the Twin Towers.

27. Why mysteriously was WTC7, a Silverstein property, in his own words, "pulled," even though there were only two small fires on two floors of an otherwise undamaged building? Two other buildings, the Federal Building at Vesey and Church Streets and the Verizon Communications building, which are adjacent to and north of WTC1, just like WTC7, sustained some damage, but were re-opened for use after repairs. Also, the newer World Financial Center buildings located across West Street from the Twin Towers had extensive exterior damage and dust problems. But, they had no fires and were completely repaired within months of 9/11.  The Verizon Communications building had some fire damage due to electrical equipment damage, but it was far less damage than one might think if 9/11 was a terrorist attack, since about half of the telecom trunk lines for the New York Financial Markets (brokerage houses and trading exchanges)go through that structure.

28. Few people have paid attention to the total destruction of the Vista Hotel (WTC3) was almost half destroyed by the collapse of WTC2. It almost looks in a photo of that event that debris from WTC2 was falling on a portion of WTC3 and disintegrated part of the building, with no fire resulting other than a roof fire reported prior to the collapse of WTC2. After WTC1 collapsed, the rest of the building seems to go up in a cloud of dust and smoke. All that was left was a three to four story section of the south end of the building. The rest of the building just seems to have disappeared with some steel from WTC1 lying on the ground where the hotel used to be. How could this total destruction of WTC3 be explained? It is almost as if the same apparent disintegration process involved in the collapse of WTC1 and 2 was transferred by debris contact to WTC3.

For more questions and answers we recommend a visit to the 911Truth.org site.